Sign the Petition
The WA Ratepayers Association is calling for an inquiry into WA Planning Process. Help them to achieve their goal of 10 000 signatures by downloading this form, collecting signatures and posting to the address on the form.
By combining with other groups we have a stronger voice and can work towards common goals.
👀 Spotted outside the Mundaring Anglican Parish Op Shop.
Did you know the landowner for the proposed North $toneville (AKA $P34) is none other than the Perth Anglican Diocese?
Maybe the church leaders should get behind the local parish up here and consider an alternate vision for the site... From conservation to reconciliation, there is no shortage of ideas out there... Engaging a suburban property developer to contribute to Perth's damaging sprawl is the opposite of what this community wants. Plonking an urban estate in a fire prone area is downright dangerous.
Can you be like the local Mundaring Anglican Parish legends and get banner painting? The banners are appearing EVERYWHERE and they look fantastic!
And when Sunday the 15th MARCH rolls around, you know what to do... untie the banner off your fence and bring them to the Save Perth Hills rally at 9:30am in Sculpture Park Mundaring 📣📣📣📣📣
If you have an old banner from when this campaign started, dust it off and stick it on your fence, gate or between two local trees!
Thank you to all of you for your ongoing words of support, comments and encouragement 🙏🏻
His experience building in a fire risk zone is non-existent... and it is showing... WHY put suburbia in a Fire Risk zone?
This is getting ridiculous and it is why we ALL need to attend the 15th March - 9.30am Sculpture Park, Mundaring.
For N.$toneville: “Bushfire Attack Level (BAL LOW) ratings for homes not dissimilar to the rest of Perth... “...
HUH?
take a look at Page 9 of this link. It shows just how out of touch the Satterley rhetoric is: https://satterley.com.au/documents-and-media/documents/wa/north-stoneville/north-stoneville-community-drop-in-day-display-boards-7-july-2019.pdf
In our last post, we featured Satterley’s CRAZY idea for a ‘100 metre Safe Zone‘ for 4000 residents to ‘safely gather during a bushfire emergency.’
Now they tell us - “Most sites (at North Stoneville) will not require increased construction standards for radiant heat or ember attack protection.”
What planet are they on???
And, this is despite the loss of 33 lives, more than 3000 homes and more than a billion animals in Australia’s current summer fire crisis, AND the 2008 fire in ‘North Stoneville’ and the 2014 Stoneville, Parkerville Mt Helena disaster that cost a life and 57 homes...
Satterley justifies this position stating: Fuel reduction to reduce bushfire risk to existing community.
In other words - wipe out 180 hectares of native vegetation and 100 year old and older jarrahs and marris - and North Stoneville becomes just another, treeless, bitumised sea of suburbia...
Don’t worry about ember attack from the surrounding EXTREME FIRE ZONE - or nearby National Park!
